PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAXJ vs. SHUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAXJ vs. SHUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAXJ achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than SHUS's 11.17% return.


MAXJ

1D
0.22%
1M
0.34%
6M
3.11%
YTD
3.65%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.32%

SHUS

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.21%
6M
7.84%
YTD
11.17%
1Y
18.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.74M$2.01M$1.56M
$381.44$481.50$2.69K

MAXJ vs. SHUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
3.65%8.97%1.64%
SHUS
Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF
11.17%10.89%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MAXJ and SHUS is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024

0.57

The correlation between MAXJ and SHUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAXJ vs. SHUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAXJ
MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

SHUS
SHUS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SHUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SHUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAXJ vs. SHUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAXJSHUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.30

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

2.49

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.21

8.97

+14.24

MAXJ vs. SHUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the SHUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAXJ and SHUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAXJ vs. SHUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAXJ drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum SHUS drawdown of -14.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXJ and SHUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAXJSHUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-14.09%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

-6.95%

+5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-1.06%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-2.48%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

1.92%

-1.62%

Volatility

MAXJ vs. SHUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) is 0.68%, while Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF (SHUS) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that MAXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAXJSHUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

2.85%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.91%

7.37%

-5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35%

10.12%

-7.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

12.41%

-7.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.10%

12.41%

-7.31%

MAXJ vs. SHUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAXJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SHUS's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAXJ vs. SHUS - Dividend Comparison

MAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than SHUS's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
0.97%1.01%0.81%
SHUS
Stratified LargeCap Hedged ETF
1.24%1.37%0.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAXJ and SHUS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHUS has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to MAXJ (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAXJ dropped -6.35% vs SHUS's -14.09%.

On 1-year performance, SHUS leads with 18.08% vs 7.01% for MAXJ. On fees, MAXJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MAXJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SHUS has performed better with a 18.08% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAXJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SHUS.

SHUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.97% for MAXJ.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MAXJ and 0.79% for SHUS.

MAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAXJ and SHUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer