MAXI vs. BCDF

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

MAXI (Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAXI returned 8.73%/yr vs 15.44%/yr for BCDF. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MAXI charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.

Performance

MAXI vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAXI achieves a -34.40% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 7.32% return.

MAXI

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 3.34%
• 6M: -22.59%
• YTD: -34.40%
• 1Y: -62.54%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.37%

BCDF

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 6.52%
• 6M: 6.70%
• YTD: 7.32%
• 1Y: 4.32%
• 3Y*: 15.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	$15.33K	$19.61K	$41.43K
MAXI Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF	$97.38K	$101.93K	$219.12K

MAXI vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MAXI Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF	-34.40%	-28.59%	92.92%	144.12%	-13.34%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	7.32%	11.63%	14.87%	24.99%	-5.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MAXI and BCDF is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022	0.46

Return for Risk

MAXI vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAXI

MAXI Risk / Return Rank: 2
MAXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MAXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MAXI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MAXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MAXI Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 15
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 15
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAXI vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAXI	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	0.29	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.60	0.49	-2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.06	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	0.31	-1.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	0.97	-2.21

MAXI vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAXI Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAXI and BCDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAXI vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAXI drawdown since its inception was -69.56%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXI and BCDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAXI	BCDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.56%	-27.70%	-41.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.56%	-14.02%	-55.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.56%	-14.02%	-55.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.74%	-3.97%	-62.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.83%	-9.75%	-11.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.66%	4.46%	+46.20%

Volatility

MAXI vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF (MAXI) has a higher volatility of 15.33% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 2.24%. This indicates that MAXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAXI	BCDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.33%	2.24%	+13.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.22%	11.20%	+32.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.92%	15.07%	+49.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.23%	16.86%	+46.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.23%	16.86%	+46.37%

MAXI vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAXI has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAXI vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

MAXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.40%, more than BCDF's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.35%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
MAXI Simplify Bitcoin Strategy PLUS Income ETF	54.40%	49.00%	32.06%	29.63%	4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAXI and BCDF in my portfolio?

MAXI and BCDF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAXI or BCDF?

MAXI has higher volatility (15.33%) compared to BCDF (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAXI dropped -69.56% vs BCDF's -27.70%.

Which ETF is better, MAXI or BCDF?

On 3-year performance, BCDF leads with 15.44% vs 8.73% for MAXI. On fees, BCDF is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, BCDF has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAXI or BCDF?

Over the 3-year period, BCDF has performed better with a 15.44% return vs 8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAXI or BCDF?

BCDF is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MAXI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAXI or BCDF?

MAXI has the higher dividend yield at 54.40%, compared with 2.35% for BCDF.

What is the main difference between MAXI and BCDF?

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for MAXI and 0.85% for BCDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.