MATFX vs. MCSMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MATFX (Matthews Asia Innovators Fund) and MCSMX (Matthews China Small Companies Fund) are both mutual funds - MATFX is a Asia Pacific Equities fund managed by Matthews, while MCSMX is a China Equities fund managed by Matthews. Over the past 10 years, MATFX returned 16.28%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for MCSMX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MATFX charges 1.18%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for MCSMX.

Performance

MATFX vs. MCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATFX achieves a 64.51% return, which is significantly higher than MCSMX's 42.66% return. Over the past 10 years, MATFX has outperformed MCSMX with an annualized return of 16.28%, while MCSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.83% annualized return.

MATFX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 16.96%
• YTD: 64.51%
• 6M: 66.89%
• 1Y: 101.02%
• 3Y*: 35.59%
• 5Y*: 11.22%
• 10Y*: 16.28%

MCSMX

• 1D: 1.94%
• 1M: 10.79%
• YTD: 42.66%
• 6M: 44.25%
• 1Y: 73.85%
• 3Y*: 21.20%
• 5Y*: 1.54%
• 10Y*: 13.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MATFX vs. MCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MATFX Matthews Asia Innovators Fund	64.51%	30.22%	16.47%	-1.77%	-24.66%	-5.90%	86.75%	29.60%	-18.59%	52.78%
MCSMX Matthews China Small Companies Fund	42.66%	28.85%	2.82%	-17.50%	-31.25%	6.71%	82.73%	35.41%	-17.65%	53.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MATFX and MCSMX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2011	0.75

The correlation between MATFX and MCSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MATFX vs. MCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MATFX

MATFX Risk / Return Rank: 97
MATFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MATFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
MATFX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MATFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
MATFX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

MCSMX

MCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 92
MCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
MCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
MCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MATFX vs. MCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) and Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MATFX	MCSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.68	3.55	+1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.50	4.53	+0.96
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.80	1.60	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.33	6.34	+2.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	26.06	18.74	+7.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MATFX vs. MCSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MATFX Sharpe Ratio is 4.68, which is higher than the MCSMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATFX and MCSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MATFX	MCSMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.68	3.55	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	0.06	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.62	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.42	-0.09

Drawdowns

MATFX vs. MCSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATFX drawdown since its inception was -76.88%, which is greater than MCSMX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATFX and MCSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MATFX	MCSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.88%	-55.77%	-21.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-12.32%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.19%	-26.50%	+8.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.33%	-53.98%	+8.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.42%	-55.77%	+3.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-3.21%	+2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.17%	-20.21%	-7.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	4.11%	-0.12%

Volatility

MATFX vs. MCSMX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia Innovators Fund (MATFX) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX) at 9.07%. This indicates that MATFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MATFX	MCSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.46%	9.07%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.23%	17.91%	+1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.62%	22.02%	+0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.50%	24.45%	+0.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.64%	22.32%	+0.32%

MATFX vs. MCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MATFX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSMX's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

MATFX vs. MCSMX - Dividend Comparison

MATFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MCSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MATFX Matthews Asia Innovators Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	26.54%	31.07%	1.67%	0.29%	2.63%	8.44%	0.00%	15.24%
MCSMX Matthews China Small Companies Fund	1.56%	2.23%	1.35%	2.36%	1.78%	26.38%	16.98%	1.03%	2.25%	5.66%	4.79%	8.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MATFX and MCSMX in my portfolio?

MATFX and MCSMX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MATFX or MCSMX?

MATFX has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to MCSMX (9.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MATFX dropped -76.88% vs MCSMX's -55.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MATFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.68 vs 3.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.