MARZ vs. UXJL
MARZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. MARZ is passively managed, while UXJL is actively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MARZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
MARZ vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARZ achieves a 7.95% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
MARZ
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.18%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARZ vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MARZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF | 7.95% | 6.71% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARZ and UXJL is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARZ vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
MARZ
UXJL
MARZ vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 1.87 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
MARZ vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARZ drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARZ and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.89% | -10.29% | -8.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.76% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -1.51% | -2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | — | — |
Volatility
MARZ vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARZ | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.33% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.71% | 13.90% | -4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.29% | 13.90% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.20% | 13.90% | -1.70% |
MARZ vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARZ vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
MARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while UXJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF | 3.06% | 3.30% | 4.55% | 7.33% | 0.78% | 2.43% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, MARZ and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MARZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MARZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
MARZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for UXJL.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MARZ and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for MARZ and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer