PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARZ vs. PSMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARZ vs. PSMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MARZ having a 7.95% return and PSMR slightly lower at 7.68%.


MARZ

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.18%
YTD
7.95%
6M
7.73%
1Y
20.32%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*

PSMR

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.54%
YTD
7.68%
6M
8.38%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARZ vs. PSMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MARZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF
7.95%12.90%17.90%20.37%-12.70%14.04%
PSMR
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF
7.68%6.74%11.99%16.85%-4.11%7.37%

Correlation

The correlation between MARZ and PSMR is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.90

The correlation between MARZ and PSMR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARZ vs. PSMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARZ
MARZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PSMR
PSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARZ vs. PSMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARZPSMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.96

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

15.03

-12.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

73.58

-61.74

MARZ vs. PSMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the PSMR Sharpe Ratio of 4.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARZ and PSMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARZPSMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

4.23

-2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.01

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

1.05

-0.11

Drawdowns

MARZ vs. PSMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARZ drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than PSMR's maximum drawdown of -11.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARZ and PSMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARZPSMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.89%

-11.78%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.45%

-0.99%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.84%

-11.78%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.89%

-11.78%

-7.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-0.15%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-1.67%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

0.20%

+1.52%

Volatility

MARZ vs. PSMR - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) has a higher volatility of 2.33% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) at 0.71%. This indicates that MARZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARZPSMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

0.71%

+1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

2.48%

+4.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.71%

3.53%

+6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.29%

8.48%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.20%

8.41%

+3.79%

MARZ vs. PSMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PSMR's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

MARZ vs. PSMR - Dividend Comparison

MARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while PSMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MARZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF
3.06%3.30%4.55%7.33%0.78%2.43%
PSMR
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MARZ and PSMR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MARZ has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARZ dropped -18.89% vs PSMR's -11.78%.

On 5-year performance, MARZ leads with 10.65% vs 8.52% for PSMR. On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MARZ has performed better with a 10.65% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MARZ.

MARZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for PSMR.

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MARZ and 0.61% for PSMR.

PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARZ and PSMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer