MARZ vs. PBFR
Compare and contrast key facts about TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR).
MARZ and PBFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MARZ is a passively managed fund by TrueShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Price Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2021. PBFR is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024.
Performance
MARZ vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MARZ vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MARZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF | -3.87% | 12.90% | 6.18% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | -0.75% | 10.44% | 5.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARZ achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's -0.75% return.
MARZ
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -3.87%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 12.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- —
PBFR
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MARZ vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MARZ vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
MARZ
PBFR
MARZ vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARZ | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.34 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.99 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.84 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | 10.86 | -4.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARZ | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.34 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.20 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between MARZ and PBFR is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MARZ vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
MARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF | 3.43% | 3.30% | 4.55% | 7.33% | 0.78% | 2.43% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MARZ vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARZ drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARZ and PBFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARZ | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.89% | -8.50% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -6.15% | -3.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -1.56% | -3.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -0.68% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.04% | +1.08% |
Volatility
MARZ vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 2.42%. This indicates that MARZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MARZ | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 2.42% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 3.46% | +4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 8.18% | +6.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 7.13% | +5.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 7.13% | +5.17% |