MARU vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MARU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MARU is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Price Return, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MARU returned 19.61% vs 80.26% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. MARU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

MARU vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARU achieves a 7.88% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.

MARU

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 84.75%
• 6M: 81.10%
• 1Y: 80.26%
• 3Y*: 21.86%
• 5Y*: 15.98%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARU vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MARU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF	7.88%	12.53%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	84.75%	-8.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MARU and DBO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	-0.12

The correlation between MARU and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MARU vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARU

MARU Risk / Return Rank: 61
MARU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
MARU Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MARU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 65
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARU vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MARU	DBO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	2.34	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	2.94	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.38	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	4.44	-1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.51	9.02	+2.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MARU vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARU Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARU and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MARU	DBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	2.34	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.43	0.02	+1.41

Drawdowns

MARU vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARU drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARU and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARU	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-90.18%	+81.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.56%	-18.19%	+11.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-51.38%	+50.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.34%	-62.25%	+60.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	8.92%	-7.21%

Volatility

MARU vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF (MARU) is 2.44%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that MARU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARU	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.44%	12.61%	-10.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.47%	28.20%	-20.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.81%	34.46%	-24.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.78%	32.29%	-20.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.78%	31.78%	-20.00%

MARU vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

MARU vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

MARU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.90%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%
MARU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Mar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARU and DBO in my portfolio?

MARU and DBO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MARU or DBO?

DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to MARU (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARU dropped -8.50% vs DBO's -90.18%.

Which ETF is better, MARU or DBO?

On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 80.26% vs 19.61% for MARU. On fees, MARU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, MARU has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MARU or DBO?

Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 80.26% return vs 19.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MARU or DBO?

MARU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MARU or DBO?

DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for MARU.

What is the main difference between MARU and DBO?

MARU is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBO is Oil & Gas. MARU tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) Price Return, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: AllianzIM and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MARU and 0.78% for DBO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.