MART vs. COMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MART (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MART is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MART returned 16.35%/yr vs 16.86%/yr for COMT. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MART charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.

Performance

MART vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MART achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.

MART

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 2.60%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 9.29%
• 1Y: 19.86%
• 3Y*: 16.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 39.06%
• 1Y: 47.51%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MART vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MART Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF	8.18%	14.93%	15.60%	16.94%
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	39.67%	6.07%	5.96%	-4.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MART and COMT is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023	0.03

The correlation between MART and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MART vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MART	COMT
Technology	36.2%	-
Financial Services	11.9%	100.0%
Communication Services	10.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	-
Healthcare	8.4%	-
Industrials	8.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	-
Energy	3.5%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

MART vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MART

MART Risk / Return Rank: 86
MART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MART Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
MART Omega Ratio Rank: 90
MART Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MART Martin Ratio Rank: 90

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 71
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MART vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MART	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	2.24	+0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.16	2.88	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.40	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	5.95	-2.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.14	14.11	+7.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MART vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MART Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MART and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MART	COMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	2.24	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.79	0.20	+1.59

Drawdowns

MART vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MART drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MART and COMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MART	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.61%	-51.89%	+40.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.30%	-8.02%	+2.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.61%	-13.31%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-4.82%	+4.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.90%	-24.07%	+23.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	3.38%	-2.44%

Volatility

MART vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) is 1.31%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that MART experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MART	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	7.37%	-6.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.60%	18.80%	-13.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.07%	21.29%	-14.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.69%	21.06%	-11.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.69%	18.89%	-9.20%

MART vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MART has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

MART vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

MART has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	5.54%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
MART Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MART and COMT in my portfolio?

MART and COMT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MART or COMT?

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to MART (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MART dropped -11.61% vs COMT's -51.89%.

Which ETF is better, MART or COMT?

On 3-year performance, COMT leads with 16.86% vs 16.35% for MART. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, MART has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MART or COMT?

Over the 3-year period, COMT has performed better with a 16.86% return vs 16.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MART or COMT?

COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MART.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MART or COMT?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.00% for MART.

What is the main difference between MART and COMT?

MART is categorized as Options Trading, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MART and 0.48% for COMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.