MART vs. APRD
MART (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF) and APRD (Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. MART charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRD.
Performance
MART vs. APRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MART
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- 19.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MART vs. APRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MART Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF | 6.84% |
APRD Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
MART vs. APRD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MART
APRD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MART
APRD
Financial Services
MART
APRD
Communication Services
MART
APRD
Consumer Cyclical
MART
APRD
Healthcare
MART
APRD
Industrials
MART
APRD
Consumer Defensive
MART
APRD
Energy
MART
APRD
Utilities
MART
APRD
Real Estate
MART
APRD
Basic Materials
MART
APRD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MART vs. APRD — Risk / Return Rank
MART
APRD
MART vs. APRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART) and Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MART | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.14 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MART | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.79 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MART vs. APRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MART drawdown since its inception was -11.61%, which is greater than APRD's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MART and APRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MART | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | 0.00% | -11.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | 0.00% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | 0.00% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | — | — |
Volatility
MART vs. APRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MART | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.07% | 0.00% | +7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.69% | 0.00% | +9.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.69% | 0.00% | +9.69% |
MART vs. APRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MART has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than APRD's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MART vs. APRD - Dividend Comparison
Neither MART nor APRD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MART is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MART is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRD.
MART and APRD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MART and 0.79% for APRD.
Find the right allocation for MART and APRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer