PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARS vs. PLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARS vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MARS

1D
3.41%
1M
25.54%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTW

1D
-0.05%
1M
4.75%
YTD
-26.24%
6M
-26.55%
1Y
2.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARS vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MARS and PLTW is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARS vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARS

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARS vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MARS vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARSPLTWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.25

0.19

+7.06

Drawdowns

MARS vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -46.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and PLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARSPLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-46.29%

+26.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.76%

-39.67%

+22.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-19.63%

+16.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.32%

Volatility

MARS vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARSPLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.61%

61.72%

+0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.61%

72.73%

-10.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.61%

72.73%

-10.12%

MARS vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MARS vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 121.36%.


PositionTTM2025
MARS
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
121.36%72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


MARS and PLTW have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MARS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MARS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 121.36%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.

MARS is categorized as Technology Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.99% for PLTW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARS and PLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer