MARS vs. NXTG
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and NXTG (First Trust IndXX NextG ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MARS is actively managed, while NXTG is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NXTG.
Performance
MARS vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 25.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTG
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- 17.41%
- YTD
- 51.79%
- 6M
- 52.46%
- 1Y
- 78.10%
- 3Y*
- 35.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
MARS vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 53.15% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 41.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and NXTG is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
NXTG
MARS vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARS | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.25 | 0.68 | +6.57 |
Drawdowns
MARS vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum NXTG drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and NXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -33.61% | +14.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.76% | -2.59% | -14.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -7.87% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.61% | 18.54% | +44.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.61% | 17.94% | +44.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.61% | 18.88% | +43.73% |
MARS vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 1.13% | 1.56% | 1.51% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.97% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 1.27% | 1.65% | 1.23% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and NXTG have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NXTG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NXTG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.70% for NXTG.
Find the right allocation for MARS and NXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer