MARS vs. MAGS
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
MARS vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- -5.56%
- 1M
- -26.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- 6M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 30.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARS vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | -2.67% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and MAGS is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MAGS
MARS vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARS | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.19 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARS vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.60% | -29.91% | -15.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.60% | -3.98% | -41.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -4.80% | -7.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.02% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.55% | 21.36% | +46.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.55% | 26.01% | +41.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.55% | 26.01% | +41.54% |
MARS vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and MAGS have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.29% for MAGS.
Find the right allocation for MARS and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer