PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARS vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARS vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MARS

1D
-6.85%
1M
20.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGS

1D
-1.08%
1M
2.17%
YTD
3.73%
6M
3.62%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
33.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARS vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MARS and MAGS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARS vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARS

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARS vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MARS vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARSMAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.31

1.55

+4.76

Drawdowns

MARS vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum MAGS drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and MAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARSMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-29.91%

+10.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.50%

-3.55%

-15.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-4.70%

+1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

Volatility

MARS vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARSMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.89%

20.08%

+42.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.89%

25.94%

+36.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.89%

25.94%

+36.95%

MARS vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MARS vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.43%1.48%0.81%0.44%
MARS
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MARS and MAGS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.29% for MAGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARS and MAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer