MARS vs. KROP
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MARS is actively managed, while KROP is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.
Performance
MARS vs. KROP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 25.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 12.86%
- 3Y*
- 0.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARS vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 53.15% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and KROP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
KROP
MARS vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARS | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.25 | -0.57 | +7.82 |
Drawdowns
MARS vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and KROP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -61.96% | +42.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.76% | -48.93% | +32.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -44.50% | +40.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.99% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.61% | 16.04% | +46.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.61% | 22.27% | +40.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.61% | 22.27% | +40.34% |
MARS vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.34% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and KROP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.50% for KROP.
Find the right allocation for MARS and KROP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer