MARS vs. FTEC
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MARS is actively managed, while FTEC is passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
MARS vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- -4.74%
- 1M
- -30.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 6M
- 20.59%
- 1Y
- 43.89%
- 3Y*
- 30.26%
- 5Y*
- 19.62%
- 10Y*
- 25.18%
MARS vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 12.68% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 26.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and FTEC is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTEC
MARS vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARS vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, which is greater than FTEC's maximum drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -34.95% | -2.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.03% | -8.39% | -28.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -5.57% | -2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.31% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.92% | 22.79% | +45.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.92% | 25.60% | +42.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.92% | 24.86% | +43.06% |
MARS vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and FTEC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
FTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.08% for FTEC.
Find the right allocation for MARS and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer