MARS vs. CRTC
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MARS is actively managed, while CRTC is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.
Performance
MARS vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- 3.41%
- 1M
- 25.54%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRTC
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 5.40%
- YTD
- 9.32%
- 6M
- 9.09%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARS vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 53.15% |
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 8.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and CRTC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
CRTC
MARS vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARS | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.25 | 1.38 | +5.87 |
Drawdowns
MARS vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, roughly equal to the maximum CRTC drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and CRTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.50% | -19.07% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.76% | -0.61% | -16.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -2.13% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.41% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | CRTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.61% | 12.77% | +49.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.61% | 15.72% | +46.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.61% | 15.72% | +46.89% |
MARS vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF | 0.99% | 1.03% | 1.13% | 0.16% |
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and CRTC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.35% for CRTC.
Find the right allocation for MARS and CRTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer