PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARS vs. CHAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARS vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MARS

1D
3.41%
1M
25.54%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHAT

1D
-2.47%
1M
21.73%
YTD
70.00%
6M
67.89%
1Y
133.72%
3Y*
54.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARS vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MARS and CHAT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARS vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARS

CHAT
CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARS vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MARS vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARSCHATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.25

1.93

+5.31

Drawdowns

MARS vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and CHAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARSCHATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-31.34%

+11.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.76%

-3.11%

-13.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-5.35%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

Volatility

MARS vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARSCHATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.61%

30.81%

+31.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.61%

29.92%

+32.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.61%

29.92%

+32.69%

MARS vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MARS and CHAT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

MARS vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MARS and CHAT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MARS and CHAT have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

CHAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARS and CHAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer