PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARS.L vs. SGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARS.L vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Marston’s plc (MARS.L) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MARS.L is traded in GBp, while SGRT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SGRT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARS.L achieves a -22.42% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 38.71% return.


MARS.L

1D
0.11%
1M
-9.92%
YTD
-22.42%
6M
-23.33%
1Y
10.48%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
-13.44%
10Y*
-9.16%

SGRT

1D
-7.19%
1M
-0.24%
YTD
38.71%
6M
37.95%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARS.L vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MARS.L
Marston’s plc
-22.42%51.15%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
38.71%25.10%

Correlation

The correlation between MARS.L and SGRT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARS.L vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARS.L
MARS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
MARS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MARS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

SGRT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARS.L vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marston’s plc (MARS.L) and SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARS.LSGRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

MARS.L vs. SGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARS.LSGRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

3.05

-3.10

Drawdowns

MARS.L vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARS.L drawdown since its inception was -83.33%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -17.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS.L and SGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARS.LSGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.33%

-17.09%

-66.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.58%

-8.79%

-56.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.61%

-3.24%

-36.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.84%

Volatility

MARS.L vs. SGRT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARS.LSGRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.06%

33.18%

+5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.73%

33.18%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.41%

33.18%

+26.23%

Dividends

MARS.L vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

MARS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MARS.L
Marston’s plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.90%7.97%6.67%5.37%4.20%
SGRT
SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF
0.12%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MARS.L and SGRT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARS.L and SGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer