MARO vs. APLY

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

MARO (YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) and APLY (YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while APLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MARO returned -26.60% vs 22.62% for APLY. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

MARO vs. APLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARO achieves a 23.97% return, which is significantly higher than APLY's -2.51% return.

MARO

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -3.95%
• YTD: 23.97%
• 6M: 15.95%
• 1Y: -26.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APLY

• 1D: -6.28%
• 1M: -10.32%
• YTD: -2.51%
• 6M: -3.00%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: 6.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARO vs. APLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	23.97%	-48.05%	-23.63%
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	-2.51%	4.69%	0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MARO and APLY is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024	0.24

Return for Risk

MARO vs. APLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARO

MARO Risk / Return Rank: 6
MARO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MARO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MARO Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MARO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MARO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

APLY

APLY Risk / Return Rank: 38
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 40
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARO vs. APLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MARO	APLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	1.19	-1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	1.66	-1.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.24	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	1.93	-2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.67	4.74	-5.41

MARO vs. APLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARO Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the APLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARO and APLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MARO vs. APLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARO drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than APLY's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARO and APLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARO	APLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.75%	-30.41%	-41.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.51%	-11.76%	-53.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.76%	-11.72%	-41.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.31%	-6.89%	-35.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.90%	4.79%	+35.11%

Volatility

MARO vs. APLY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) has a higher volatility of 16.43% compared to YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) at 8.36%. This indicates that MARO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARO	APLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.43%	8.36%	+8.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.16%	14.98%	+32.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.56%	19.05%	+43.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.12%	21.21%	+43.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.12%	21.21%	+43.91%

MARO vs. APLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MARO and APLY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

MARO vs. APLY - Dividend Comparison

MARO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 191.31%, more than APLY's 39.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APLY YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF	39.57%	36.38%	24.95%	14.36%
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	191.31%	277.68%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARO and APLY in my portfolio?

MARO and APLY have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MARO or APLY?

MARO has higher volatility (16.43%) compared to APLY (8.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARO dropped -71.75% vs APLY's -30.41%.

Which ETF is better, MARO or APLY?

On 1-year performance, APLY leads with 22.62% vs -26.60% for MARO. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, APLY has been the lower-risk option at 8.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MARO or APLY?

Over the 1-year period, APLY has performed better with a 22.62% return vs -26.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MARO or APLY?

MARO and APLY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MARO or APLY?

MARO has the higher dividend yield at 191.31%, compared with 39.57% for APLY.

What is the main difference between MARO and APLY?

MARO is categorized as Derivative Income, while APLY is Options Trading.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.