PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARFX vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARFX vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund (MARFX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARFX achieves a 16.41% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 19.93% return. Over the past 10 years, MARFX has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 11.28%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.71% annualized return.


MARFX

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.02%
6M
12.75%
YTD
16.41%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
13.00%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
11.28%
ALL TIME*
9.58%

MTUM

1D
0.27%
1M
-5.35%
6M
17.31%
YTD
19.93%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
27.89%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
15.71%
ALL TIME*
15.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$558.09M$637.73M$538.11M

MARFX vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MARFX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund
16.41%13.68%6.71%12.58%-4.06%26.43%7.21%29.57%-9.55%8.79%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
19.93%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MARFX and MTUM is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.65

The correlation between MARFX and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARFX vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MARFX
MARFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MARFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MARFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MARFX vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund (MARFX) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MARFXMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.19

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.40

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

5.72

+4.11

MARFX vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARFX and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MARFX vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARFX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARFX and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARFXMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.39%

-34.08%

-21.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-17.99%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-20.99%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.07%

-32.28%

+12.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.09%

-34.08%

-8.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-13.22%

+12.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.97%

-6.22%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

4.39%

-1.94%

Volatility

MARFX vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund (MARFX) is 3.26%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that MARFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARFXMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

11.22%

-7.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.74%

23.33%

-13.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.18%

25.53%

-12.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

21.89%

-5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.89%

21.72%

-2.83%

MARFX vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MARFX vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

MARFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than MTUM's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MARFX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund
9.17%11.33%7.46%3.70%4.50%11.16%2.13%3.95%8.41%22.19%5.43%15.72%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.62%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


MARFX and MTUM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to MARFX (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARFX dropped -55.39% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

MARFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARFX and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer