MARA vs. USFR
MARA (MARA Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, MARA returned -12.86%/yr vs 2.48%/yr for USFR. Their -0.02 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
MARA vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARA achieves a 30.85% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 2.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MARA has underperformed USFR with an annualized return of -12.86%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively higher 2.48% annualized return.
MARA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- 6M
- 29.83%
- YTD
- 30.85%
- 1Y
- -26.75%
- 3Y*
- -9.46%
- 5Y*
- -17.88%
- 10Y*
- -12.86%
- ALL TIME*
- -10.04%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 3.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.98%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $525.82M | $574.45M | $576.54M | |
| $352.79M | $265.75M | $249.59M |
MARA vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | 30.85% | -46.45% | -28.61% | 586.84% | -89.59% | 214.75% | 1,084.48% | -39.16% | -91.17% | -40.41% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 2.29% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARA and USFR is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | -0.02 |
The correlation between MARA and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.02 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARA vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
MARA
USFR
MARA vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARA | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -14.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -51.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 14.07 | -13.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 200.37 | -200.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 800.41 | -801.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARA vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARA drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARA and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARA | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.74% | -1.36% | -98.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.53% | -0.02% | -70.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.34% | -0.06% | -78.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.87% | -0.18% | -95.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.19% | -0.80% | -98.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.41% | 0.00% | -92.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.13% | -0.15% | -77.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.94% | 0.00% | +44.94% |
Volatility
MARA vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a higher volatility of 30.37% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that MARA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARA | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.37% | 0.09% | +30.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.02% | 0.20% | +63.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.39% | 0.27% | +82.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.03% | 0.39% | +105.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.48% | 0.76% | +143.72% |
Dividends
MARA vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
MARA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.79% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARA and USFR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MARA has higher volatility (30.37%) compared to USFR (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARA dropped -99.74% vs USFR's -1.36%.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.64 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MARA and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer