MARA vs. USFR
MARA (MARA Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, MARA returned -13.02%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for USFR. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MARA vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARA achieves a 36.86% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 2.07% return. Over the past 10 years, MARA has underperformed USFR with an annualized return of -13.02%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively higher 2.50% annualized return.
MARA
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- -16.05%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- YTD
- 36.86%
- 1Y
- -34.49%
- 3Y*
- -12.06%
- 5Y*
- -12.03%
- 10Y*
- -13.02%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- 2.50%
MARA vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | 36.86% | -46.45% | -28.61% | 586.84% | -89.59% | 214.75% | 1,084.48% | -39.16% | -91.17% | -40.41% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 2.07% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARA and USFR is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2014 | -0.02 |
The correlation between MARA and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.02 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARA vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
MARA
USFR
MARA vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARA | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -15.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -51.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 14.08 | -13.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 200.62 | -201.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 801.26 | -802.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARA vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARA drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARA and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARA | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.74% | -1.36% | -98.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.53% | -0.02% | -70.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.34% | -0.06% | -78.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.87% | -0.18% | -95.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.20% | -0.80% | -98.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.06% | 0.00% | -92.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.08% | -0.15% | -77.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.18% | 0.00% | +44.18% |
Volatility
MARA vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a higher volatility of 19.80% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.07%. This indicates that MARA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARA | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.80% | 0.07% | +19.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.57% | 0.19% | +60.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.34% | 0.27% | +79.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.01% | 0.39% | +105.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.21% | 0.77% | +143.44% |
Dividends
MARA vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
MARA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARA MARA Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.83% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARA and USFR have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MARA has higher volatility (19.80%) compared to USFR (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARA dropped -99.74% vs USFR's -1.36%.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.83 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MARA and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer