MARA vs. BOXX
MARA (Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while BOXX (Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF) is Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index. Over the past 3 years, MARA returned 11.65%/yr vs 4.75%/yr for BOXX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MARA vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARA achieves a 55.46% return, which is significantly higher than BOXX's 1.58% return.
MARA
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 18.01%
- YTD
- 55.46%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- -8.94%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- -10.53%
- 10Y*
- -10.91%
BOXX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARA vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | 55.46% | -46.45% | -28.61% | 586.84% | 8.74% |
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 1.58% | 4.37% | 5.16% | 5.04% | 0.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARA and BOXX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2022 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARA vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank
MARA
BOXX
MARA vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARA | BOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -37.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 9.98 | -8.93 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 59.77 | -59.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | 531.84 | -532.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARA | BOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 | 12.84 | -12.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 12.91 | -13.00 |
Drawdowns
MARA vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARA drawdown since its inception was -99.74%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARA and BOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARA | BOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.74% | -0.12% | -99.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.53% | -0.07% | -70.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.34% | -0.12% | -78.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.98% | 0.00% | -90.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -78.00% | -0.00% | -78.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.03% | 0.01% | +42.02% |
Volatility
MARA vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) has a higher volatility of 16.33% compared to Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX) at 0.09%. This indicates that MARA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARA | BOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.33% | 0.09% | +16.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.00% | 0.25% | +57.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.65% | 0.32% | +77.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.79% | 0.37% | +105.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.06% | 0.37% | +143.69% |
Dividends
MARA vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MARA nor BOXX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% |
MARA Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARA and BOXX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MARA has higher volatility (16.33%) compared to BOXX (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARA dropped -99.74% vs BOXX's -0.12%.
BOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.84 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MARA and BOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer