MAPTX vs. FIQPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX).
MAPTX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Sep 11, 1994. FIQPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
MAPTX vs. FIQPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MAPTX vs. FIQPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAPTX Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund | 1.43% | 30.07% | 3.25% | -4.82% | -20.69% | -17.92% | 28.88% | 10.75% | 2.63% |
FIQPX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z | 3.73% | 37.22% | 21.13% | 13.98% | -30.50% | -14.73% | 73.23% | 31.17% | 0.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAPTX achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than FIQPX's 3.73% return.
MAPTX
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- -9.89%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 3.98%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- -3.94%
- 10Y*
- 4.10%
FIQPX
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -9.31%
- YTD
- 3.73%
- 6M
- 4.21%
- 1Y
- 36.92%
- 3Y*
- 22.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.61%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAPTX vs. FIQPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAPTX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQPX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MAPTX vs. FIQPX — Risk / Return Rank
MAPTX
FIQPX
MAPTX vs. FIQPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAPTX | FIQPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.88 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 2.44 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.74 | -0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.67 | 9.79 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAPTX | FIQPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.88 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | 0.12 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.62 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between MAPTX and FIQPX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MAPTX vs. FIQPX - Dividend Comparison
MAPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, while FIQPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAPTX Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund | 2.29% | 2.33% | 8.93% | 2.93% | 8.52% | 4.85% | 5.74% | 3.44% | 4.78% | 1.25% | 2.61% | 11.18% |
FIQPX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 12.82% | 6.63% | 5.47% | 6.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MAPTX vs. FIQPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAPTX drawdown since its inception was -69.79%, which is greater than FIQPX's maximum drawdown of -57.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPTX and FIQPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAPTX | FIQPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.79% | -57.62% | -12.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.03% | -13.52% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -53.21% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.33% | -11.13% | -15.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.47% | -22.55% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 3.79% | +0.17% |
Volatility
MAPTX vs. FIQPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Matthews Pacific Tiger Fund (MAPTX) is 9.66%, while Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia Fund Class Z (FIQPX) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that MAPTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIQPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MAPTX | FIQPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | 10.19% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.70% | 14.86% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 20.46% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 22.60% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 22.87% | -5.01% |