PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAP.MC vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAP.MC vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Mapfre (MAP.MC) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MAP.MC is traded in EUR, while PLTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PLTR values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAP.MC achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -26.89% return.


MAP.MC

1D
1.98%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
-1.65%
6M
2.67%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
36.98%
5Y*
24.25%
10Y*
14.45%

PLTR

1D
-2.28%
1M
-3.44%
YTD
-26.89%
6M
-29.25%
1Y
-6.99%
3Y*
95.40%
5Y*
40.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAP.MC vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MAP.MC
Mapfre
-1.65%82.89%33.09%13.84%7.00%22.38%24.96%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-26.89%107.14%369.55%159.43%-62.56%-16.89%125.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MAP.MC and PLTR is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAP.MC vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAP.MC
MAP.MC Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAP.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAP.MC vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mapfre (MAP.MC) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAP.MCPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.03

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

-0.13

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.69

-0.24

+4.93

MAP.MC vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAP.MC Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAP.MC and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAP.MC vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAP.MC drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -82.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAP.MC and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAP.MCPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.35%

-82.49%

+19.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.97%

-39.52%

+23.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.97%

-43.40%

+27.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-76.99%

+56.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-38.49%

+35.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.21%

-38.11%

+18.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

21.97%

-15.82%

Volatility

MAP.MC vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mapfre (MAP.MC) is 5.52%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 16.80%. This indicates that MAP.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAP.MCPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

16.80%

-11.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.13%

37.76%

-20.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.48%

50.85%

-29.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.30%

65.02%

-43.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.17%

69.35%

-44.18%

Dividends

MAP.MC vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

MAP.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAP.MC
Mapfre
3.88%3.90%5.15%6.09%6.82%7.53%8.57%6.20%6.30%5.46%4.23%6.06%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MAP.MC vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mapfre and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. MAP.MC values in EUR, PLTR values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


MAP.MC and PLTR have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAP.MC and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer