MAP.MC vs. CCH.L
MAP.MC (Mapfre) and CCH.L (Coca Cola HBC AG) are both stocks. MAP.MC operates in Insurance - Diversified (Financial Services), while CCH.L operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MAP.MC returned 14.45%/yr vs 15.38%/yr for CCH.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAP.MC vs. CCH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MAP.MC is traded in EUR, while CCH.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CCH.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAP.MC achieves a -1.65% return, which is significantly lower than CCH.L's 23.65% return. Over the past 10 years, MAP.MC has underperformed CCH.L with an annualized return of 14.45%, while CCH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return.
MAP.MC
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- -1.65%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 29.44%
- 3Y*
- 36.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.45%
CCH.L
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 10.84%
- YTD
- 23.65%
- 6M
- 29.34%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 27.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
MAP.MC vs. CCH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP.MC Mapfre | -1.65% | 82.89% | 33.09% | 13.84% | 7.00% | 22.38% | -27.04% | 7.69% | -8.22% | -2.82% |
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 23.65% | 36.40% | 28.04% | 22.63% | -23.82% | 17.32% | -9.87% | 18.15% | 1.99% | 33.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAP.MC and CCH.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAP.MC vs. CCH.L — Risk / Return Rank
MAP.MC
CCH.L
MAP.MC vs. CCH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mapfre (MAP.MC) and Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAP.MC | CCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 0.90 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.69 | 1.90 | +2.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAP.MC vs. CCH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAP.MC drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than CCH.L's maximum drawdown of -52.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAP.MC and CCH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAP.MC | CCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -52.83% | -10.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.97% | -18.78% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.97% | -18.78% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -46.29% | +25.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.42% | -52.83% | +0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -1.99% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.21% | -14.18% | -5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 8.95% | -2.80% |
Volatility
MAP.MC vs. CCH.L - Volatility Comparison
Mapfre (MAP.MC) and Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) have volatilities of 5.52% and 5.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAP.MC | CCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 5.47% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.13% | 16.73% | +0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.48% | 23.27% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 24.49% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.17% | 27.16% | -1.99% |
Dividends
MAP.MC vs. CCH.L - Dividend Comparison
MAP.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than CCH.L's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.96% | 2.94% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 2.35% | 6.99% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.76% |
MAP.MC Mapfre | 3.88% | 3.90% | 5.15% | 6.09% | 6.82% | 7.53% | 8.57% | 6.20% | 6.30% | 5.46% | 4.23% | 6.06% |
Financials
MAP.MC vs. CCH.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mapfre and Coca Cola HBC AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MAP.MC and CCH.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MAP.MC and CCH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer