PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MANU vs. SPOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MANU vs. SPOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manchester United plc (MANU) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANU achieves a 46.36% return, which is significantly higher than SPOT's -17.37% return.


MANU

1D
0.39%
1M
21.16%
YTD
46.36%
6M
53.29%
1Y
35.07%
3Y*
-0.50%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
4.21%

SPOT

1D
-0.45%
1M
9.82%
YTD
-17.37%
6M
-16.86%
1Y
-32.50%
3Y*
44.21%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MANU vs. SPOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MANU
Manchester United plc
46.36%-8.24%-14.87%-12.64%65.01%-13.92%-15.08%6.06%-1.50%
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.
-17.37%29.80%138.08%138.01%-66.27%-25.62%110.40%31.76%-31.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MANU and SPOT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2018

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MANU:

$4.02B

SPOT:

$100.42B

EPS

MANU:

-£0.10

SPOT:

€12.94

PS Ratio

MANU:

4.41

SPOT:

4.94

PB Ratio

MANU:

16.66

SPOT:

10.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

MANU:

£677.79M

SPOT:

€17.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MANU:

£169.11M

SPOT:

€5.68B

EBITDA (TTM)

MANU:

£216.23M

SPOT:

€2.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MANU vs. SPOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MANU
MANU Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MANU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MANU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MANU Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MANU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MANU Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SPOT
SPOT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SPOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SPOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MANU vs. SPOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manchester United plc (MANU) and Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MANUSPOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.89

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

-0.70

+2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

-1.19

+4.00

MANU vs. SPOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MANU Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the SPOT Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANU and SPOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MANU vs. SPOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANU drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, smaller than the maximum SPOT drawdown of -80.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANU and SPOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MANUSPOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.05%

-80.51%

+22.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.52%

-46.80%

+25.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.39%

-46.80%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.51%

-76.39%

+21.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.19%

-38.16%

+24.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.78%

-30.87%

+6.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.53%

27.26%

-14.73%

Volatility

MANU vs. SPOT - Volatility Comparison

Manchester United plc (MANU) has a higher volatility of 19.89% compared to Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT) at 16.26%. This indicates that MANU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MANUSPOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.89%

16.26%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.96%

37.24%

-10.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.22%

45.34%

-8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.18%

47.55%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.85%

47.35%

-9.50%

Dividends

MANU vs. SPOT - Dividend Comparison

Neither MANU nor SPOT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MANU
Manchester United plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.26%1.08%0.90%0.95%0.91%1.26%0.51%
SPOT
Spotify Technology S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MANU vs. SPOT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manchester United plc and Spotify Technology S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
189.50M
4.61B
(MANU) Total Revenue
(SPOT) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. MANU values in GBP, SPOT values in EUR

MANU vs. SPOT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Manchester United plc and Spotify Technology S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
32.9%
Portfolio components
MANU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manchester United plc reported a gross profit of 189.50M and revenue of 189.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

SPOT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.51B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.9%.

MANU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manchester United plc reported an operating income of 10.31M and revenue of 189.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

SPOT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported an operating income of 726.76M and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

MANU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manchester United plc reported a net income of -11.78M and revenue of 189.50M, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.

SPOT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Spotify Technology S.A. reported a net income of 732.86M and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of 15.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MANU and SPOT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MANU has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to SPOT (16.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANU dropped -58.05% vs SPOT's -80.51%.

MANU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MANU and SPOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer