MANA vs. BCDF

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

MANA (Grayscale Decentraland Trust) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MANA returned -56.52%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for BCDF. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MANA vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANA achieves a -53.27% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's -2.63% return.

MANA

• 1D: -2.98%
• 1M: -38.60%
• YTD: -53.27%
• 6M: -54.66%
• 1Y: -75.75%
• 3Y*: -56.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCDF

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -8.73%
• YTD: -2.63%
• 6M: -3.96%
• 1Y: -1.52%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MANA vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MANA Grayscale Decentraland Trust	-53.27%	-91.36%	-28.08%	756.41%	-86.07%
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	-2.63%	11.63%	14.87%	24.99%	-21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MANA and BCDF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022	0.09

Return for Risk

MANA vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MANA

MANA Risk / Return Rank: 3
MANA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MANA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MANA Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MANA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MANA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BCDF

BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 8
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MANA vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MANA	BCDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	-0.10	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.89	-0.03	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.00	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	-0.11	-0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	-0.36	-0.98

MANA vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MANA Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANA and BCDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MANA vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANA drawdown since its inception was -99.28%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANA and BCDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	MANA	BCDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.28%	-27.70%	-71.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.85%	-14.02%	-71.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.28%	-14.02%	-85.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.20%	-12.88%	-86.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.69%	-9.81%	-61.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.43%	4.20%	+52.23%

Volatility

MANA vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) has a higher volatility of 37.05% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 5.44%. This indicates that MANA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MANA	BCDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.05%	5.44%	+31.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	89.80%	11.65%	+78.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	117.59%	15.44%	+102.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	174.61%	16.99%	+157.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	174.61%	16.99%	+157.62%

Dividends

MANA vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

MANA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF	2.59%	2.53%	1.63%	0.69%	0.38%
MANA Grayscale Decentraland Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MANA and BCDF in my portfolio?

MANA and BCDF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MANA or BCDF?

MANA has higher volatility (37.05%) compared to BCDF (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANA dropped -99.28% vs BCDF's -27.70%.

Which ETF is better, MANA or BCDF?

On 3-year performance, BCDF leads with 12.46% vs -56.52% for MANA. On volatility, BCDF has been the lower-risk option at 5.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MANA or BCDF?

Over the 3-year period, BCDF has performed better with a 12.46% return vs -56.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MANA or BCDF?

BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for MANA.

What is the main difference between MANA and BCDF?

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Horizon.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.