PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAN vs. RYZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAN vs. RYZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) and Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MAN

1D
1.04%
1M
35.14%
6M
47.65%
YTD
80.43%
1Y
40.17%
3Y*
-8.68%
5Y*
-11.67%
10Y*
0.65%
ALL TIME*
4.84%

RYZ

1D
3.66%
1M
15.65%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$79.63M$78.10M$49.40M
$13.21M$11.58M$12.62M

MAN vs. RYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAN and RYZ is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026

0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAN:

$2.44B

RYZ:

$1.16B

EPS

MAN:

$2.22

RYZ:

-$0.88

PS Ratio

MAN:

0.13

RYZ:

0.18

PB Ratio

MAN:

1.17

RYZ:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAN:

$18.72B

RYZ:

$5.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAN:

$3.05B

RYZ:

$1.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

MAN:

$431.40M

RYZ:

$120.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAN vs. RYZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAN
MAN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAN Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

RYZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAN vs. RYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) and Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MANRYZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.25

MAN vs. RYZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAN vs. RYZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAN drawdown since its inception was -75.49%, which is greater than RYZ's maximum drawdown of -27.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAN and RYZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MANRYZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.49%

-27.81%

-47.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.94%

-10.44%

-38.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.87%

-9.53%

-17.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.71%

Volatility

MAN vs. RYZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MANRYZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.14%

51.84%

+9.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.52%

51.84%

-11.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.32%

51.84%

-14.52%

Dividends

MAN vs. RYZ - Dividend Comparison

MAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than RYZ's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAN
ManpowerGroup Inc.
2.75%4.84%5.34%3.70%3.27%2.59%2.51%2.25%3.12%1.47%1.94%1.90%
RYZ
Ryerson Holding Corporation
1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MAN vs. RYZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ManpowerGroup Inc. and Ryerson Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

MAN vs. RYZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ManpowerGroup Inc. and Ryerson Holding Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

MAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ManpowerGroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 780.30M and revenue of 4.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.1%.

RYZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ryerson Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 358.10M and revenue of 2.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.9%.

MAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ManpowerGroup Inc. reported an operating income of 112.00M and revenue of 4.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

RYZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ryerson Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 37.60M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.

MAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ManpowerGroup Inc. reported a net income of 53.50M and revenue of 4.86B, resulting in a net margin of 1.1%.

RYZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ryerson Holding Corporation reported a net income of 15.50M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MAN and RYZ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAN and RYZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer