PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYZ vs. LEG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RYZ vs. LEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYZ) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RYZ

1D
1.03%
1M
3.84%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LEG

1D
2.44%
1M
9.83%
YTD
0.23%
6M
1.53%
1Y
19.95%
3Y*
-25.16%
5Y*
-23.55%
10Y*
-10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYZ vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RYZ and LEG is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026

0.46

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RYZ:

$1.19B

LEG:

$1.54B

EPS

RYZ:

-$1.32

LEG:

$1.60

PS Ratio

RYZ:

0.19

LEG:

0.51

PB Ratio

RYZ:

0.93

LEG:

1.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

RYZ:

$5.00B

LEG:

$3.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RYZ:

$863.30M

LEG:

$717.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

RYZ:

$70.90M

LEG:

$433.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYZ vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


LEG
LEG Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
LEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYZ vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryerson Holding Corporation (RYZ) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYZLEGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.43

RYZ vs. LEG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYZ vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYZ drawdown since its inception was -27.81%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYZ and LEG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYZLEGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.81%

-86.41%

+58.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.47%

-76.82%

+67.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-19.69%

+10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.95%

Volatility

RYZ vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYZLEGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.76%

49.69%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.76%

42.52%

+7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.76%

39.84%

+9.92%

Dividends

RYZ vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison

RYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than LEG's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEG
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
1.83%1.82%6.35%6.95%5.40%4.03%3.61%3.11%4.19%2.98%2.74%3.00%
RYZ
Ryerson Holding Corporation
1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RYZ vs. LEG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ryerson Holding Corporation and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.57B
0
(RYZ) Total Revenue
(LEG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RYZ and LEG have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYZ and LEG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer