MAMB vs. IUSB
MAMB (Monarch Ambassador Income ETF) and IUSB (iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds - MAMB tracks the Monarch Ambassador Income Index while IUSB tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MAMB returned 0.72%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for IUSB. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAMB charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IUSB.
Performance
MAMB vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAMB achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than IUSB's 0.43% return.
MAMB
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 9.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IUSB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 1.94%
MAMB vs. IUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF | 2.01% | 10.69% | 1.32% | 4.90% | -13.02% | 1.46% |
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 0.43% | 7.38% | 2.11% | 6.23% | -13.04% | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAMB and IUSB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between MAMB and IUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAMB vs. IUSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAMB
IUSB
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Financial Services
MAMB
IUSB
-
Utilities
MAMB
IUSB
-
Healthcare
MAMB
IUSB
-
Industrials
MAMB
IUSB
-
Consumer Cyclical
MAMB
IUSB
-
Communication Services
MAMB
IUSB
-
Basic Materials
MAMB
-
IUSB
-
Consumer Defensive
MAMB
-
IUSB
-
Energy
MAMB
-
IUSB
Real Estate
MAMB
-
IUSB
-
Technology
MAMB
-
IUSB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAMB vs. IUSB — Risk / Return Rank
MAMB
IUSB
MAMB vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAMB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.66 | 1.54 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 2.30 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.27 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 2.20 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.49 | 6.68 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAMB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.54 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.08 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.46 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
MAMB vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAMB drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, which is greater than IUSB's maximum drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMB and IUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAMB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.33% | -17.90% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.55% | -2.53% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.38% | -5.82% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.33% | -17.87% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -1.33% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -3.59% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 0.83% | +0.42% |
Volatility
MAMB vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison
Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) at 1.24%. This indicates that MAMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAMB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 1.24% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.21% | 2.62% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.67% | 3.62% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.99% | 5.79% | +1.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.91% | 5.04% | +1.87% |
MAMB vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAMB has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAMB vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison
MAMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, less than IUSB's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 4.23% | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.68% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% |
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF | 2.44% | 2.47% | 2.11% | 1.73% | 0.92% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAMB and IUSB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAMB has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to IUSB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMB dropped -19.33% vs IUSB's -17.90%.
On 5-year performance, MAMB leads with 0.72% vs 0.44% for IUSB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IUSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MAMB has performed better with a 0.72% return vs 0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for MAMB.
IUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 2.44% for MAMB.
MAMB tracks Monarch Ambassador Income Index, while IUSB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for MAMB and 0.06% for IUSB.
MAMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAMB and IUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer