MAMA vs. ASIC
MAMA (Mama's Creations Inc.) and ASIC (Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC) are both stocks. MAMA operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while ASIC operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past year, MAMA returned 88.02% vs -12.21% for ASIC. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAMA vs. ASIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAMA achieves a 10.53% return, which is significantly higher than ASIC's -1.14% return.
MAMA
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 10.53%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 88.02%
- 3Y*
- 75.68%
- 5Y*
- 38.65%
- 10Y*
- 35.78%
ASIC
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 6.79%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- -12.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAMA vs. ASIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAMA Mama's Creations Inc. | 10.53% | 65.72% |
ASIC Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC | -1.14% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAMA and ASIC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | 0.13 |
Fundamentals
MAMA:
$645.92M
ASIC:
$1.03B
MAMA:
$0.15
ASIC:
$1.95
MAMA:
101.52
ASIC:
10.66
MAMA:
3.00
ASIC:
0.05
MAMA:
3.28
ASIC:
2.06
MAMA:
11.67
ASIC:
1.64
MAMA:
$189.23M
ASIC:
$470.18M
MAMA:
$46.29M
ASIC:
$257.61M
MAMA:
$11.97M
ASIC:
$120.37M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAMA vs. ASIC — Risk / Return Rank
MAMA
ASIC
MAMA vs. ASIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) and Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAMA | ASIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.99 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | -0.44 | +4.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.06 | -0.79 | +9.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAMA vs. ASIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAMA drawdown since its inception was -89.83%, which is greater than ASIC's maximum drawdown of -33.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMA and ASIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAMA | ASIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.83% | -33.63% | -56.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.05% | -30.77% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.21% | -15.84% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -18.99% | -26.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.67% | 17.98% | -8.31% |
Volatility
MAMA vs. ASIC - Volatility Comparison
Mama's Creations Inc. (MAMA) has a higher volatility of 19.32% compared to Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC (ASIC) at 9.65%. This indicates that MAMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAMA | ASIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.32% | 9.65% | +9.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.09% | 33.68% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.50% | 47.68% | +4.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.99% | 47.79% | +10.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.61% | 47.79% | +33.82% |
Dividends
MAMA vs. ASIC - Dividend Comparison
Neither MAMA nor ASIC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MAMA vs. ASIC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mama's Creations Inc. and Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MAMA vs. ASIC - Profitability Comparison
MAMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.43M and revenue of 52.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.
ASIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported a gross profit of 67.08M and revenue of 128.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.
MAMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported an operating income of 2.66M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
ASIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported an operating income of 34.23M and revenue of 128.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.5%.
MAMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mama's Creations Inc. reported a net income of 2.06M and revenue of 52.77M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
ASIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ategrity Specialty Holdings LLC reported a net income of 25.47M and revenue of 128.96M, resulting in a net margin of 19.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MAMA and ASIC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAMA has higher volatility (19.32%) compared to ASIC (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMA dropped -89.83% vs ASIC's -33.63%.
MAMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAMA and ASIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer