PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAKX vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAKX vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAKX achieves a 33.58% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -58.86% return.


MAKX

1D
-3.25%
1M
-4.07%
6M
22.41%
YTD
33.58%
1Y
41.45%
3Y*
21.16%
5Y*
10Y*

BITU

1D
-5.16%
1M
-6.57%
6M
-62.01%
YTD
-58.86%
1Y
-80.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAKX vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAKX
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF
33.58%21.63%6.82%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-58.86%-37.07%41.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MAKX and BITU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAKX vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAKX
MAKX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAKX vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAKXBITUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.80

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

-0.97

+3.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

-1.43

+8.64

MAKX vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAKX and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAKX vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAKX drawdown since its inception was -40.27%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -83.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAKX and BITU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAKXBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.27%

-83.45%

+43.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.05%

-83.45%

+67.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.77%

-81.60%

+70.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.38%

-36.56%

+20.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

56.22%

-50.46%

Volatility

MAKX vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) is 14.36%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 22.54%. This indicates that MAKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAKXBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.36%

22.54%

-8.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.00%

70.09%

-45.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.23%

88.23%

-56.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.84%

96.86%

-68.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.84%

96.86%

-68.02%

MAKX vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAKX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAKX vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

MAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than BITU's 93.76% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
93.76%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%
MAKX
ProShares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF
0.14%0.15%0.24%0.52%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAKX and BITU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BITU has higher volatility (22.54%) compared to MAKX (14.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAKX dropped -40.27% vs BITU's -83.45%.

On 1-year performance, MAKX leads with 41.45% vs -80.42% for BITU. On fees, MAKX is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, MAKX has been the lower-risk option at 14.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAKX has performed better with a 41.45% return vs -80.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAKX is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 93.76%, compared with 0.14% for MAKX.

MAKX is categorized as Technology Equities, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. MAKX tracks S&P Kensho Smart Factories Index, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for MAKX and 0.95% for BITU.

MAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAKX and BITU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer