PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGY vs. YBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGY vs. YBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly higher than YBTC's -23.39% return.


MAGY

1D
-1.26%
1M
1.86%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
13.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YBTC

1D
-2.77%
1M
-16.32%
YTD
-23.39%
6M
-26.70%
1Y
-35.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGY vs. YBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAGY and YBTC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGY vs. YBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGY
MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

YBTC
YBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
YBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
YBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGY vs. YBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAGYYBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.85

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

-0.76

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

-1.39

+4.51

MAGY vs. YBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the YBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGY and YBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAGYYBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

-0.91

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

0.16

+1.37

Drawdowns

MAGY vs. YBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum YBTC drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and YBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGYYBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.29%

-47.09%

+32.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.29%

-47.09%

+32.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-44.06%

+40.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-12.89%

+10.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

25.69%

-21.40%

Volatility

MAGY vs. YBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) is 3.67%, while Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF (YBTC) has a volatility of 8.85%. This indicates that MAGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGYYBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

8.85%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

31.81%

-20.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.38%

39.20%

-24.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

40.81%

-26.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

40.81%

-26.24%

MAGY vs. YBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than YBTC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGY vs. YBTC - Dividend Comparison

MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.35%, less than YBTC's 88.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
37.35%23.38%0.00%
YBTC
Roundhill Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF
88.13%76.04%44.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGY and YBTC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YBTC has higher volatility (8.85%) compared to MAGY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGY dropped -14.29% vs YBTC's -47.09%.

On 1-year performance, MAGY leads with 13.34% vs -35.71% for YBTC. On fees, YBTC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAGY has performed better with a 13.34% return vs -35.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YBTC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.

YBTC has the higher dividend yield at 88.13%, compared with 37.35% for MAGY.

MAGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while YBTC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGY and 0.95% for YBTC.

MAGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGY and YBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer