MAGY vs. TSMY
MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) and TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGY returned 13.34% vs 92.13% for TSMY. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MAGY vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 37.04% return.
MAGY
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMY
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 37.04%
- 6M
- 39.21%
- 1Y
- 92.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | -1.50% | 26.79% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.04% | 70.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGY and TSMY is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MAGY and TSMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGY vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank
MAGY
TSMY
MAGY vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGY | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.50 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 5.98 | -5.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 22.18 | -19.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGY | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 3.21 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 1.56 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
MAGY vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum TSMY drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and TSMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGY | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -31.15% | +16.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -15.50% | +1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -1.37% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -5.51% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 4.17% | +0.12% |
Volatility
MAGY vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) is 3.67%, while YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) has a volatility of 9.52%. This indicates that MAGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGY | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 9.52% | -5.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.29% | 22.68% | -11.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.38% | 28.87% | -14.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 33.22% | -18.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 33.22% | -18.65% |
MAGY vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MAGY and TSMY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MAGY vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison
MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.35%, less than TSMY's 52.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 37.35% | 23.38% | 0.00% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 52.19% | 56.76% | 13.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGY and TSMY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMY has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to MAGY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGY dropped -14.29% vs TSMY's -31.15%.
On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 92.13% vs 13.34% for MAGY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 92.13% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGY and TSMY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
TSMY has the higher dividend yield at 52.19%, compared with 37.35% for MAGY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.
TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGY and TSMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer