MAGY vs. OMAH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH).

MAGY and OMAH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGY is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 23, 2025. OMAH is an actively managed fund by VistaShares. It was launched on Mar 4, 2025.

Performance

MAGY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAGY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	-9.17%	26.79%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	-0.42%	10.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -9.17% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's -0.42% return.

MAGY

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: -4.67%
• YTD: -9.17%
• 6M: -7.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: -0.42%
• 6M: 0.85%
• 1Y: 5.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

MAGY

Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF

OMAH

VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF

Return for Risk

MAGY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 25
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 26
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGY	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	0.42	+0.68

Correlation

The correlation between MAGY and OMAH is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MAGY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.95%, more than OMAH's 15.85% yield.

	TTM	2025
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	36.95%	23.38%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.85%	12.86%

Drawdowns

MAGY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGY	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-11.83%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.14%	-1.98%	-9.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-1.40%	-0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.08%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MAGY	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.84%	13.93%	+0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.84%	13.98%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.84%	13.98%	+0.86%