MAGY vs. GPIX
MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGY returned 1.42% vs 21.14% for GPIX. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MAGY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.
Performance
MAGY vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -6.83% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 10.23% return.
MAGY
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.83%
- 1Y
- 1.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.75%
GPIX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- YTD
- 10.23%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $55.40M | $53.93M | $51.40M | |
| $1.76M | $2.00M | $2.81M |
MAGY vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | -6.83% | 26.42% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 10.23% | 27.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGY and GPIX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025 | 0.77 |
The correlation between MAGY and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAGY vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGY
GPIX
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
MAGY
GPIX
Basic Materials
MAGY
-
GPIX
Communication Services
MAGY
-
GPIX
Consumer Cyclical
MAGY
-
GPIX
Consumer Defensive
MAGY
-
GPIX
Energy
MAGY
-
GPIX
Healthcare
MAGY
-
GPIX
Industrials
MAGY
-
GPIX
Real Estate
MAGY
-
GPIX
Technology
MAGY
-
GPIX
Utilities
MAGY
-
GPIX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGY vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
MAGY
GPIX
MAGY vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGY | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.32 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.53 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 11.97 | -12.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGY vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum GPIX drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGY | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -17.50% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -7.71% | -6.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.86% | -0.57% | -8.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -1.46% | -1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 1.63% | +3.90% |
Volatility
MAGY vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 3.07%. This indicates that MAGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGY | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.83% | 3.07% | +3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.10% | 8.97% | +5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 11.17% | +5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 13.76% | +2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 13.76% | +2.42% |
MAGY vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGY vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.90%, more than GPIX's 8.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 7.46% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 38.99% | 23.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGY and GPIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGY has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to GPIX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGY dropped -14.29% vs GPIX's -17.50%.
On 1-year performance, GPIX leads with 21.14% vs 1.42% for MAGY. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, GPIX has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIX has performed better with a 21.14% return vs 1.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.
MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 38.99%, compared with 7.46% for GPIX.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGY and 0.29% for GPIX.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGY and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer