MAGY vs. FIYY
MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) and FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAGY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for FIYY.
Performance
MAGY vs. FIYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MAGY
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- -5.47%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIYY
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY vs. FIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | -2.25% |
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGY and FIYY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGY vs. FIYY — Risk / Return Rank
MAGY
FIYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MAGY vs. FIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGY | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGY vs. FIYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, which is greater than FIYY's maximum drawdown of -2.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and FIYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGY | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -2.51% | -11.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -2.13% | -5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.14% | -1.47% | -1.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | — | — |
Volatility
MAGY vs. FIYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGY | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 5.08% | +10.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 5.08% | +10.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 5.08% | +10.45% |
MAGY vs. FIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FIYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGY vs. FIYY - Dividend Comparison
MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.95%, more than FIYY's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.13% | 0.00% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 38.95% | 23.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGY and FIYY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 38.95%, compared with 1.13% for FIYY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGY and 1.07% for FIYY.
Find the right allocation for MAGY and FIYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer