MAGY vs. EGGY
MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) and EGGY (NestYield Dynamic Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGY returned 13.34% vs 50.17% for EGGY. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EGGY.
Performance
MAGY vs. EGGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGY achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than EGGY's 38.58% return.
MAGY
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EGGY
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 12.89%
- YTD
- 38.58%
- 6M
- 36.91%
- 1Y
- 50.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY vs. EGGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | -1.50% | 26.79% |
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 38.58% | 25.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGY and EGGY is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between MAGY and EGGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGY vs. EGGY — Risk / Return Rank
MAGY
EGGY
MAGY vs. EGGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) and NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAGY | EGGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.31 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.75 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 6.93 | -3.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAGY | EGGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.74 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 1.36 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
MAGY vs. EGGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGY drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum EGGY drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGY and EGGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGY | EGGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -18.34% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.29% | -18.34% | +4.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | -1.34% | -2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -5.25% | +2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 7.26% | -2.97% |
Volatility
MAGY vs. EGGY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) is 3.67%, while NestYield Dynamic Income ETF (EGGY) has a volatility of 12.26%. This indicates that MAGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGY | EGGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | 12.26% | -8.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.29% | 23.94% | -12.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.38% | 29.07% | -14.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 28.64% | -14.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 28.64% | -14.07% |
MAGY vs. EGGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EGGY's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGY vs. EGGY - Dividend Comparison
MAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.35%, more than EGGY's 25.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EGGY NestYield Dynamic Income ETF | 25.74% | 28.26% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 37.35% | 23.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGY and EGGY have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EGGY has higher volatility (12.26%) compared to MAGY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGY dropped -14.29% vs EGGY's -18.34%.
On 1-year performance, EGGY leads with 50.17% vs 13.34% for MAGY. On fees, EGGY is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EGGY has performed better with a 50.17% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EGGY is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.
MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 37.35%, compared with 25.74% for EGGY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and NestYield. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MAGY and 0.95% for EGGY.
EGGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGY and EGGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer