MAGS vs. WMT
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while WMT (Walmart Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 31.29%/yr vs 34.18%/yr for WMT. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MAGS vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 9.07% return.
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 28.71%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.77%
MAGS vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 9.07% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 5.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGS and WMT is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.11 |
The correlation between MAGS and WMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGS vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
MAGS
WMT
MAGS vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGS | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 1.83 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 5.82 | -1.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGS vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGS | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.91% | -77.14% | +47.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.62% | -15.75% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.91% | -21.93% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.50% | -9.81% | +1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -14.63% | +9.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 4.94% | +0.56% |
Volatility
MAGS vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 5.86%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGS | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 9.86% | -4.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | 18.49% | -3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 23.67% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 21.68% | +4.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 21.73% | +4.24% |
Dividends
MAGS vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than WMT's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.80% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGS and WMT have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs WMT's -77.14%.
WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGS and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer