PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGS vs. RGTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGS vs. RGTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly higher than RGTI's -5.28% return.


MAGS

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.97%
YTD
-1.59%
6M
-0.43%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
31.29%
5Y*
10Y*

RGTI

1D
1.70%
1M
13.93%
YTD
-5.28%
6M
-18.81%
1Y
73.39%
3Y*
152.06%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGS vs. RGTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
-1.59%22.99%63.97%35.74%
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
-5.28%45.15%1,449.40%70.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and RGTI is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGS vs. RGTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

RGTI
RGTI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RGTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGS vs. RGTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGSRGTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.96

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

1.47

+2.73

MAGS vs. RGTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the RGTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and RGTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. RGTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum RGTI drawdown of -96.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and RGTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGSRGTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.91%

-96.89%

+66.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.62%

-77.10%

+58.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.91%

-78.83%

+48.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.50%

-62.76%

+54.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-58.84%

+54.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

49.98%

-44.48%

Volatility

MAGS vs. RGTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 5.86%, while Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a volatility of 44.79%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGSRGTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

44.79%

-38.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.07%

71.15%

-56.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.30%

109.21%

-88.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.97%

128.97%

-103.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.97%

127.17%

-101.20%

Dividends

MAGS vs. RGTI - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, while RGTI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.50%1.48%0.81%0.44%
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGS and RGTI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTI has higher volatility (44.79%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs RGTI's -96.89%.

MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGS and RGTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer