MAGS vs. QTUM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. MAGS is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 28.94%/yr vs 39.51%/yr for QTUM. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

MAGS vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MAGS

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: 0.18%
• 6M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 14.23%
• 3Y*: 28.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.62%

QTUM

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -11.92%
• 6M: 22.33%
• YTD: 29.28%
• 1Y: 55.03%
• 3Y*: 39.51%
• 5Y*: 24.56%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 25.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	$254.73M	$303.60M	$278.63M
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	$54.21M	$61.13M	$111.15M

MAGS vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	0.00%	22.99%	63.97%	35.74%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	29.28%	36.65%	50.54%	19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and QTUM is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023	0.65

The correlation between MAGS and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGS vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGS	QTUM
Technology	13.8%	81.4%
Communication Services	7.7%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	2.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	1.2%
Industrials	-	8.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 27
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAGS vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGS	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	1.75	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	2.29	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.29	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	2.57	-1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.26	9.41	-7.15

MAGS vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-38.45%	+8.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-21.51%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.91%	-25.39%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.02%	-16.16%	+9.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-8.27%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.31%	5.87%	+0.44%

Volatility

MAGS vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 8.02%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.02%	11.38%	-3.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.37%	26.47%	-9.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.30%	31.67%	-9.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.09%	27.69%	-1.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.09%	27.69%	-1.60%

MAGS vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGS vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than QTUM's 0.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.48%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.83%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGS and QTUM in my portfolio?

MAGS and QTUM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGS or QTUM?

QTUM has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to MAGS (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which ETF is better, MAGS or QTUM?

On 3-year performance, QTUM leads with 39.51% vs 28.94% for MAGS. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGS or QTUM?

Over the 3-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 39.51% return vs 28.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGS or QTUM?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGS or QTUM?

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.83% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between MAGS and QTUM?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.40% for QTUM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.