MAGS vs. PTIR

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%). MAGS is actively managed, while PTIR is passively managed. Over the past year, MAGS returned 14.23% vs -58.75% for PTIR. Their 0.50 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PTIR.

Performance

MAGS vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MAGS

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: 0.18%
• 6M: -0.29%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 14.23%
• 3Y*: 28.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.62%

PTIR

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -6.82%
• 6M: -43.20%
• YTD: -62.18%
• 1Y: -58.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 164.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	$254.73M	$303.60M	$278.63M
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	$34.43M	$50.90M	$65.92M

MAGS vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	0.00%	22.99%	27.11%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-62.18%	221.36%	425.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and PTIR is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.50

MAGS vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGS	PTIR
Technology	13.8%	100.0%
Communication Services	7.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 27
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 4
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MAGS vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGS	PTIR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	-0.56	+1.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	-0.43	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	0.95	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	-0.74	+1.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.26	-1.21	+3.47

MAGS vs. PTIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the PTIR Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and PTIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum PTIR drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and PTIR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	PTIR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-79.40%	+49.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-79.40%	+60.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.02%	-73.93%	+66.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.86%	-31.05%	+26.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.31%	48.56%	-42.25%

Volatility

MAGS vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 8.02%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 27.36%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	PTIR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.02%	27.36%	-19.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.37%	81.50%	-64.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.30%	104.45%	-82.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.09%	127.66%	-101.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.09%	127.66%	-101.57%

MAGS vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIR's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGS vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than PTIR's 15.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.48%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	15.36%	5.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGS and PTIR in my portfolio?

MAGS and PTIR have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGS or PTIR?

PTIR has higher volatility (27.36%) compared to MAGS (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs PTIR's -79.40%.

Which ETF is better, MAGS or PTIR?

On 1-year performance, MAGS leads with 14.23% vs -58.75% for PTIR. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGS or PTIR?

Over the 1-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 14.23% return vs -58.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGS or PTIR?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGS or PTIR?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 1.48% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between MAGS and PTIR?

MAGS is categorized as Technology Equities, while PTIR is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 1.04% for PTIR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.