MAGS vs. MAGY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAGS returned 18.84% vs 3.73% for MAGY. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MAGY.

Performance

MAGS vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly higher than MAGY's -7.53% return.

MAGS

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -8.97%
• YTD: -4.28%
• 6M: -5.96%
• 1Y: 18.84%
• 3Y*: 29.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGY

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -7.24%
• YTD: -7.53%
• 6M: -8.15%
• 1Y: 3.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGS vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	-4.28%	57.81%
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	-7.53%	26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and MAGY is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025	0.88

The correlation between MAGS and MAGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

MAGS vs. MAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MAGS	MAGY
Technology	8.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	-
Communication Services	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 25
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

MAGY

MAGY Risk / Return Rank: 11
MAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
MAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
MAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGS vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAGS	MAGY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.24	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	0.42	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.06	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.02	0.26	+0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.34	0.81	+2.53

MAGS vs. MAGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the MAGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and MAGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and MAGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	MAGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-14.29%	-15.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-14.29%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.00%	-9.54%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-2.88%	-1.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.65%	4.60%	+1.05%

Volatility

MAGS vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) at 6.76%. This indicates that MAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	MAGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	6.76%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.51%	12.65%	+2.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.74%	15.38%	+5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.02%	15.45%	+10.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.02%	15.45%	+10.57%

MAGS vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAGS vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than MAGY's 40.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.55%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF	40.01%	23.38%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAGS and MAGY in my portfolio?

MAGS and MAGY have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAGS or MAGY?

MAGS has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to MAGY (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs MAGY's -14.29%.

Which ETF is better, MAGS or MAGY?

On 1-year performance, MAGS leads with 18.84% vs 3.73% for MAGY. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 6.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAGS or MAGY?

Over the 1-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 18.84% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAGS or MAGY?

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAGS or MAGY?

MAGY has the higher dividend yield at 40.01%, compared with 1.55% for MAGS.

What is the main difference between MAGS and MAGY?

MAGS is categorized as Technology Equities, while MAGY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.99% for MAGY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.