MAGS vs. ARKF
MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) and ARKF (ARK Fintech Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while ARKF is a Blockchain fund actively managed by ARK. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAGS returned 31.29%/yr vs 23.97%/yr for ARKF. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAGS charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARKF.
Performance
MAGS vs. ARKF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly higher than ARKF's -18.31% return.
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -18.31%
- 6M
- -21.31%
- 1Y
- -11.87%
- 3Y*
- 23.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.06%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS vs. ARKF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | -18.31% | 28.67% | 34.34% | 52.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAGS and ARKF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between MAGS and ARKF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
MAGS vs. ARKF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAGS
ARKF
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MAGS
ARKF
Consumer Cyclical
MAGS
ARKF
Communication Services
MAGS
ARKF
Basic Materials
MAGS
-
ARKF
-
Consumer Defensive
MAGS
-
ARKF
-
Energy
MAGS
-
ARKF
-
Financial Services
MAGS
-
ARKF
Healthcare
MAGS
-
ARKF
Industrials
MAGS
-
ARKF
-
Real Estate
MAGS
-
ARKF
-
Utilities
MAGS
-
ARKF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAGS vs. ARKF — Risk / Return Rank
MAGS
ARKF
MAGS vs. ARKF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MAGS | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.97 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | -0.31 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | -0.57 | +4.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MAGS vs. ARKF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum ARKF drawdown of -78.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and ARKF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAGS | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.91% | -78.63% | +48.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.62% | -38.50% | +19.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.91% | -38.50% | +8.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.50% | -38.77% | +30.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -34.95% | +30.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.50% | 21.00% | -15.50% |
Volatility
MAGS vs. ARKF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) is 5.86%, while ARK Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) has a volatility of 10.36%. This indicates that MAGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAGS | ARKF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 10.36% | -4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | 25.14% | -10.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 33.69% | -13.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 42.87% | -16.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 39.77% | -13.80% |
MAGS vs. ARKF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKF's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAGS vs. ARKF - Dividend Comparison
MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than ARKF's 0.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKF ARK Fintech Innovation ETF | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.25% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAGS and ARKF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARKF has higher volatility (10.36%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAGS dropped -29.91% vs ARKF's -78.63%.
On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 31.29% vs 23.97% for ARKF. On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 31.29% return vs 23.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ARKF.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.11% for ARKF.
MAGS is categorized as Technology Equities, while ARKF is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for MAGS and 0.75% for ARKF.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAGS and ARKF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer