PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAGG vs. PCRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAGG vs. PCRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MAGG

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.43%
6M
-0.37%
YTD
0.16%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PCRB

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGG vs. PCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MAGG
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
0.16%7.28%1.81%4.39%
PCRB
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
-0.48%7.21%1.91%5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between MAGG and PCRB is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023

0.85

The correlation between MAGG and PCRB shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAGG vs. PCRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGG
MAGG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
MAGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PCRB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGG vs. PCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Aggregate Bond ETF (MAGG) and Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAGGPCRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

MAGG vs. PCRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAGG vs. PCRB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAGGPCRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

Volatility

MAGG vs. PCRB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAGGPCRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

MAGG vs. PCRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGG has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PCRB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAGG vs. PCRB - Dividend Comparison

MAGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, while PCRB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAGG
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
4.77%4.80%5.13%1.49%
PCRB
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -
9.42%4.30%4.38%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAGG and PCRB have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCRB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCRB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MAGG.

PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.42%, compared with 4.77% for MAGG.

They also come from different issuers: Madison and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MAGG and 0.35% for PCRB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAGG and PCRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer