MADCX vs. LCSMX
MADCX (BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc.) and LCSMX (Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MADCX returned 4.43%/yr vs 7.41%/yr for LCSMX. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MADCX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LCSMX.
Performance
MADCX vs. LCSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MADCX achieves a 21.76% return, which is significantly lower than LCSMX's 38.73% return.
MADCX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- YTD
- 21.76%
- 1Y
- 42.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 4.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.14%
LCSMX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -6.73%
- 6M
- 19.79%
- YTD
- 38.73%
- 1Y
- 79.92%
- 3Y*
- 23.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.41%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MADCX vs. LCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MADCX BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. | 21.76% | 30.47% | -1.09% | 10.77% | -24.12% | -1.14% | 24.53% | 26.47% | -14.19% |
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund | 38.73% | 51.52% | -13.60% | 16.26% | -27.25% | 4.73% | 35.72% | 6.81% | 1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MADCX and LCSMX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between MADCX and LCSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MADCX vs. LCSMX — Risk / Return Rank
MADCX
LCSMX
MADCX vs. LCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MADCX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 3.17 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 12.22 | -3.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MADCX vs. LCSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MADCX drawdown since its inception was -66.58%, which is greater than LCSMX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MADCX and LCSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MADCX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.58% | -39.72% | -26.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.17% | -26.28% | +9.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.25% | -26.28% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.74% | -38.88% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.22% | -19.40% | +8.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.32% | -13.69% | -4.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 6.80% | -1.66% |
Volatility
MADCX vs. LCSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) is 11.43%, while Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) has a volatility of 16.37%. This indicates that MADCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MADCX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.43% | 16.37% | -4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 33.60% | -9.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.71% | 35.39% | -8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 22.15% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 21.59% | -2.39% |
MADCX vs. LCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MADCX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSMX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MADCX vs. LCSMX - Dividend Comparison
MADCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than LCSMX's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund | 0.72% | 1.00% | 1.29% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 3.03% | 0.48% | 0.88% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MADCX BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. | 6.52% | 4.26% | 1.90% | 1.67% | 2.22% | 5.72% | 0.97% | 1.53% | 0.98% | 0.48% | 1.82% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MADCX and LCSMX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCSMX has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to MADCX (11.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MADCX dropped -66.58% vs LCSMX's -39.72%.
LCSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MADCX and LCSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer