PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MADCX vs. GQGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MADCX vs. GQGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MADCX achieves a 21.76% return, which is significantly higher than GQGIX's 8.26% return.


MADCX

1D
0.61%
1M
-4.41%
6M
11.19%
YTD
21.76%
1Y
42.97%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*
9.32%
ALL TIME*
7.14%

GQGIX

1D
0.00%
1M
4.05%
6M
1.15%
YTD
8.26%
1Y
15.85%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MADCX vs. GQGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MADCX
BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc.
21.76%30.47%-1.09%10.77%-24.12%-1.14%24.53%26.47%-10.73%42.09%
GQGIX
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund Institutional Shares
8.26%9.92%6.19%28.81%-20.85%-2.37%33.98%21.08%-14.70%30.20%

Correlation

The correlation between MADCX and GQGIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.80

The correlation between MADCX and GQGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MADCX vs. GQGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MADCX
MADCX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MADCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MADCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MADCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MADCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MADCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GQGIX
GQGIX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GQGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GQGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MADCX vs. GQGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MADCXGQGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.27

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.86

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.85

5.22

+3.63

MADCX vs. GQGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MADCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the GQGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MADCX and GQGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MADCX vs. GQGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MADCX drawdown since its inception was -66.58%, which is greater than GQGIX's maximum drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MADCX and GQGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MADCXGQGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.58%

-33.50%

-33.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.17%

-9.11%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.25%

-18.74%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.74%

-28.02%

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.22%

-2.48%

-8.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-11.26%

-7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.14%

3.24%

+1.90%

Volatility

MADCX vs. GQGIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) has a higher volatility of 11.43% compared to GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund Institutional Shares (GQGIX) at 2.96%. This indicates that MADCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MADCXGQGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.43%

2.96%

+8.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.57%

9.71%

+14.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.71%

11.53%

+15.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

14.60%

+4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

15.85%

+3.35%

MADCX vs. GQGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MADCX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than GQGIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

MADCX vs. GQGIX - Dividend Comparison

MADCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than GQGIX's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GQGIX
GQG Partners Emerging Markets Equity Fund Institutional Shares
1.96%2.13%1.70%2.71%5.67%3.91%0.24%1.16%0.81%0.25%0.00%0.00%
MADCX
BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc.
6.52%4.26%1.90%1.67%2.22%5.72%0.97%1.53%0.98%0.48%1.82%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


MADCX and GQGIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MADCX has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to GQGIX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MADCX dropped -66.58% vs GQGIX's -33.50%.

MADCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MADCX and GQGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer