PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MADCX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MADCX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MADCX achieves a 34.34% return, which is significantly higher than ASFYX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, MADCX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 11.46%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.


MADCX

1D
1.10%
1M
10.17%
YTD
34.34%
6M
38.51%
1Y
65.24%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
11.46%

ASFYX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.71%
YTD
15.25%
6M
17.77%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
-1.44%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MADCX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MADCX
BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc.
34.34%30.47%-1.09%10.77%-24.12%-1.14%24.53%26.47%-10.73%42.09%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
15.25%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between MADCX and ASFYX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2010

0.21

Over the past year, MADCX and ASFYX have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MADCX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MADCX
MADCX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MADCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MADCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MADCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MADCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
MADCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MADCX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MADCXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.39

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.20

4.95

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.95

17.88

-0.93

MADCX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MADCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MADCX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MADCXASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

2.20

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.22

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.23

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.35

+0.04

Drawdowns

MADCX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MADCX drawdown since its inception was -66.58%, which is greater than ASFYX's maximum drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MADCX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MADCXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.58%

-36.43%

-30.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-5.24%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.25%

-30.32%

+10.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.70%

-36.43%

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.82%

-36.43%

-7.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.22%

+18.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-13.18%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

1.45%

+2.40%

Volatility

MADCX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc. (MADCX) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) at 3.67%. This indicates that MADCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MADCXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.77%

3.67%

+5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.16%

9.54%

+8.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.79%

11.77%

+9.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

13.77%

+4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

12.71%

+5.86%

MADCX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MADCX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

MADCX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

MADCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than ASFYX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.32%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
MADCX
BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund, Inc.
3.17%4.26%1.90%1.67%2.22%5.72%0.97%1.53%0.98%0.48%1.82%1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


MADCX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MADCX has higher volatility (8.77%) compared to ASFYX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MADCX dropped -66.58% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

MADCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MADCX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer