PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MACG.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MACG.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MACG.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MACG.L achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return.


MACG.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.99%
YTD
4.32%
6M
5.03%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MACG.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MACG.L
BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
4.32%6.37%5.38%6.25%-12.51%3.80%2.03%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MACG.L and CSP1.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.44

MACG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MACG.L
CSP1.L

Technology

31.8%
38.0%

Financial Services

14.6%
11.3%

Industrials

10.5%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.9%

Communication Services

9.0%
10.7%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.4%

Utilities

4.6%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.7%

Energy

3.6%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.9%

Technology

MACG.L
31.8%
CSP1.L
38.0%

Financial Services

MACG.L
14.6%
CSP1.L
11.3%

Industrials

MACG.L
10.5%
CSP1.L
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MACG.L
9.1%
CSP1.L
9.9%

Communication Services

MACG.L
9.0%
CSP1.L
10.7%

Healthcare

MACG.L
8.1%
CSP1.L
8.4%

Utilities

MACG.L
4.6%
CSP1.L
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

MACG.L
3.8%
CSP1.L
4.7%

Energy

MACG.L
3.6%
CSP1.L
3.4%

Basic Materials

MACG.L
2.7%
CSP1.L
1.7%

Real Estate

MACG.L
2.1%
CSP1.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MACG.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MACG.L
MACG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
MACG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MACG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MACG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MACG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MACG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MACG.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MACG.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.51

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

4.07

-1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

14.99

-4.04

MACG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MACG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MACG.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MACG.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.73

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

1.04

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.09

-0.59

Drawdowns

MACG.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MACG.L drawdown since its inception was -14.85%, smaller than the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACG.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MACG.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.85%

-25.48%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.97%

-7.12%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.97%

-20.77%

+16.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.85%

-20.77%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.24%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-3.32%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

1.94%

-1.08%

Volatility

MACG.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L) is 1.79%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that MACG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MACG.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.79%

2.62%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.08%

7.16%

-3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.63%

10.62%

-5.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.17%

14.31%

-9.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

15.57%

-10.56%

MACG.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MACG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MACG.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MACG.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MACG.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MACG.L.

MACG.L is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. MACG.L tracks Morningstar UK Mod Caut Tgt Alloc NR GBP, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MACG.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MACG.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer