MACG.L vs. ISAC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L).
MACG.L and ISAC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MACG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar UK Mod Caut Tgt Alloc NR GBP. It was launched on Sep 14, 2020. ISAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2001. Both MACG.L and ISAC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MACG.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MACG.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MACG.L BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | -0.36% | 6.37% | 5.38% | 6.25% | -12.51% | 3.80% | 2.03% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -0.40% | 13.64% | 19.87% | 16.44% | -8.43% | 19.97% | 6.15% |
Different Trading Currencies
MACG.L is traded in GBP, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MACG.L achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 0.03% return.
MACG.L
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- —
ISAC.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 0.03%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 19.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MACG.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MACG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
MACG.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
MACG.L
ISAC.L
MACG.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MACG.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.30 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.80 | -0.34 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 3.48 | -2.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.93 | 13.45 | -6.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MACG.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.30 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.76 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.81 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between MACG.L and ISAC.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MACG.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MACG.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MACG.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MACG.L drawdown since its inception was -14.85%, smaller than the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACG.L and ISAC.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MACG.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.85% | -33.82% | +18.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.97% | -8.85% | +4.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.85% | -26.07% | +11.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -6.16% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -4.74% | -0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 2.05% | -1.21% |
Volatility
MACG.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L) is 2.30%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that MACG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MACG.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 5.45% | -3.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.35% | 9.25% | -5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.60% | 14.76% | -9.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 14.22% | -9.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.95% | 15.45% | -10.50% |