MACG.L vs. MAGG.L
MACG.L (BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) and MAGG.L (BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from iShares - MACG.L tracks the Morningstar UK Mod Caut Tgt Alloc NR GBP while MAGG.L tracks the Morningstar UK Mod Adv Tgt Alloc NR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MACG.L returned 2.21%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for MAGG.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
MACG.L vs. MAGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MACG.L achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than MAGG.L's 13.00% return.
MACG.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 9.48%
- 3Y*
- 6.69%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGG.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 6.21%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- 1Y
- 27.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
MACG.L vs. MAGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MACG.L BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 4.32% | 6.37% | 5.38% | 6.25% | -12.51% | 3.80% | 2.03% |
MAGG.L BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 13.00% | 10.89% | 19.68% | 12.90% | -17.33% | 18.23% | 6.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MACG.L and MAGG.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.62 |
The correlation between MACG.L and MAGG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MACG.L vs. MAGG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Financial Services
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Industrials
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Consumer Cyclical
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Communication Services
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Healthcare
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Utilities
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Consumer Defensive
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Energy
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Basic Materials
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Real Estate
MACG.L
MAGG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MACG.L vs. MAGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MACG.L
MAGG.L
MACG.L vs. MAGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L) and BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MAGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MACG.L | MAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.50 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 3.68 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.95 | 15.96 | -5.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MACG.L | MAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.04 | 2.64 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.75 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.87 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
MACG.L vs. MAGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MACG.L drawdown since its inception was -14.85%, smaller than the maximum MAGG.L drawdown of -21.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MACG.L and MAGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MACG.L | MAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.85% | -21.07% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.97% | -7.36% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.97% | -17.71% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.85% | -21.07% | +6.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.70% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -5.73% | +0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 1.70% | -0.84% |
Volatility
MACG.L vs. MAGG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Conservative Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MACG.L) is 1.79%, while BlackRock ESG Multi-Asset Growth Portfolio UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MAGG.L) has a volatility of 3.58%. This indicates that MACG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MACG.L | MAGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 3.58% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.08% | 8.07% | -3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.63% | 10.30% | -5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.17% | 12.08% | -6.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 12.05% | -7.04% |
MACG.L vs. MAGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MACG.L and MAGG.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MACG.L vs. MAGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MACG.L nor MAGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MACG.L and MAGG.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MACG.L and MAGG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
MACG.L tracks Morningstar UK Mod Caut Tgt Alloc NR GBP, while MAGG.L tracks Morningstar UK Mod Adv Tgt Alloc NR GBP.
Find the right allocation for MACG.L and MAGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer